Narmada dam oustees oppose NCA decision

‘What is the basis for raising dam height?’

June 25, 2014 01:39 am | Updated November 16, 2021 11:24 pm IST - NEW DELHI:

A Narmada Bachao Andolan activist and resident of Narmada Valley during a protest at Jantar Mantar in New Delhi on Tuesday against the decision toraise the height of the Sardar Sarovar Dam. Photo: S. Subramanium

A Narmada Bachao Andolan activist and resident of Narmada Valley during a protest at Jantar Mantar in New Delhi on Tuesday against the decision toraise the height of the Sardar Sarovar Dam. Photo: S. Subramanium

Even as the official-level Narmada Control Authority (NCA) asserted that all project-affected families facing displacement at the present height of the Narmada dam had been “resettled,” several people still living in the submergence villages arrived here on Tuesday from Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra and Gujarat seeking a hearing from the Central government.

The oustees, many of who are struggling for the last 29 years, >said the NCA on June 12 gave the permission to raise the height of the dam to the final height of 138.68 metres based on the claims made by the State governments without independently verifying the status.

“We want to know what is the legal basis for giving the permission to raise the height ignoring the claims of displaced people in the affected States, including 245 villages in Madhya Pradesh alone?” asked the project-affected people who are on protest at Jantar Mantar here.

It is learnt that the NCA, in its emergency meeting, said the permission to raise the height of the dam will would only allow completion of civil works and leave the gates open on raised position.

Official figures say that of the 46,749 project-affected families from the Narmada dam, 46,498 have been resettled. Of these 4,765 have been resettled in Gujarat and 3,976 families displaced in Maharashtra have been settled in Gujarat and Maharashtra. Of the 37,757 families displaced in Madhya Pradesh, 32,233 have been resettled in the State itself and 5,524 in Gujarat.

Questioning the decision to allow raising the height of the dam, the Narmada Bachao Andolan asked whether this was done to derail the judicial inquiry into the Rs.1000-crore resettlement scam in Madhya Pradesh?

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.