PIL seeks new panel to probe Gandhi’s murder

May 27, 2016 12:00 am | Updated 05:38 am IST - Mumbai:

The PIL is slated to come up for hearing on June 6 before a High Court Bench. —file photo

The PIL is slated to come up for hearing on June 6 before a High Court Bench. —file photo

A public interest litigation in the Bombay High Court has sought setting up of a commission of inquiry to probe afresh the murder of Mahatma Gandhi in January 1948, and the conspiracy behind it. The PIL, filed by Pankaj Phadnis, author, researcher, and trustee of Abhinav Bharat, Mumbai, has claimed that the then J L Kapur Commission of Inquiry had not been able to unearth the conspiracy behind the killing of Gandhi.

According to the prosecution, on January 30, 1948, the Father of the Nation was shot at by the assassin with a revolver which had seven compartments of bullets. Gandhi had received three bullets while the remaining four were recovered by the police from the weapon.

However, the PIL alleged that Gandhi had received four bullets. The petitioner produced media clippings to show that Gandhi had sustained four bullet injuries.

The PIL, slated to come up for hearing on June 6 before a Bench headed by Chief Justice D H Waghela, said the new commission of inquiry should conduct a probe to find out who had fired the fourth shot and establish whether there was any other assassin besides Nathuram Godse.

The commission should also find out whether the motive was to cause enmity between the people of India and Pakistan by sabotaging the Gandhi-Jinnah reconciliation project of reviving people-to-people contact.

The PIL claimed that Gandhi was slated to visit Pakistan to revive people-to-people contact. However, he was shot dead prior to his departure. The petition also said the commission should find out whether any person —other than those accused in the Gandhi murder trial — had prior information of the conspiracy or had participated in such a conspiracy.

It alleged that the Kapur Commission had made certain adverse observations or findings against Veer Savarkar implying or imputing that he was involved in the murder of Gandhi. Savarkar was acquitted during the trial and hence these adverse findings should be removed. Inspired by Veer Savarkar, Abinav Bharat, Mumbai, was set up in 2001 to work for socially and economically weaker sections with focus on bridging the digital divide. — PTI

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.