Activist wants Moily to apologise for ‘misleading’ people on Yettinahole

June 12, 2016 12:00 am | Updated October 18, 2016 01:11 pm IST - MANGALURU:

Activist K.N. Somashekar speaking at a press conference in Mangaluru on Saturday. —Photo: H.S. Manjunath

Activist K.N. Somashekar speaking at a press conference in Mangaluru on Saturday. —Photo: H.S. Manjunath

Environmental activist K.N. Somashekar, one among those fighting against the Yettinahole water diversion project, on Saturday sought a public apology from the former Chief Minister M. Veerappa Moily for ‘misleading’ people by saying that the National Green Tribunal (NGT) had cleared the project.

Mr. Somashekar told presspersons here that besides Mr. Moily, he has also sought an apology from Venugopal, Superintending Engineer of Karnataka Neeravari Nigam Ltd., Tumakuru circle. Both have been issued notices seeking public apology, failing which he would initiate contempt of court proceedings before the NGT bench at Chennai.

Applications

He also said that three applications filed by Purushottam Chitrapur, Kishore Kumar and Yathiraju were pending before the tribunal while his application was pending for admission, challenging the project. In such circumstances, Mr. Moily had made the reported statement for political gains and to mislead people in arid regions of the State, Mr. Somashekar said.

He also alleged that the government was attempting to drag the hearing in cases even as the tribunal is deferring hearing in cases.

When arguments were almost completed on the maintainability of the three applications by December 2015, the Advocate General of Karnataka appeared before the Tribunal in January and raised afresh the maintainability issue.

Still, the applicants advanced fresh arguments and the order was reserved in February.

Despite repeated pleas, the order on maintainability was not pronounced while the tribunal said its expert member was transferred to Delhi and his signature was pending.

Arguments

During May, the Tribunal said that the expert member had resigned without signing the order and arguments have to be advanced afresh and posted the case to July 4.

Any judicial officer would sign pending orders before demitting the office, either on retirement or by resignation. The state of affairs with this particular case appears strange, Mr. Somashekar said.

Nethravati Sanchaya leader Dinesh Holla and others were present.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.