Twitter
Advertisement

Was Prasad Purohit doing his duty, asks NIA

Sadhavi Pragya Singh Thakur in the Malegaon blasts case, even after the NIA had claimed that there was not enough evidence against her, while replying to her bail application which was filed before the Bombay High Court

Latest News
article-main
FacebookTwitterWhatsappLinkedin

The Special NIA court has reasoned in it's order copy as to why it refused to grant discharge to the prime accused Sadhavi Pragya Singh Thakur in the Malegaon blasts case, even after the NIA had claimed that there was not enough evidence against her, while replying to her bail application which was filed before the Bombay High Court. The court also reasoned why it didn't consider claim of Lt.Col.Prasad Purohit.

The court held, "During the course of arguments Col.Purohit submitted that Military intelligence officers have their own style of functioning unlike other civilian government officials. In short, according to him he was discharging his duties while doing these acts. To which the court observed that it may be true that military intelligence doesn't not work like other government agencies, but it has to be ascertained whether the official status of Purohit furnishes only the occasion or opportunity for doing the alleged acts or whether he was really doing his duty."

Find your daily dose of news & explainers in your WhatsApp. Stay updated, Stay informed-  Follow DNA on WhatsApp.
Advertisement

Live tv

Advertisement
Advertisement