SME Times is powered by   
Search News
Just in:   • Adani Group to invest Rs 57,575 crore in Odisha  • 'Dollar Distancing' finally happening? Time for India to pitch Rupee as credible alternative: SBI Ecowrap  • 49% Indian startups now from tier 2, 3 cities: Jitendra Singh  • 'India ranks 3rd in global startup ecosystem & number of unicorns'  • LinkedIn lays off entire global events marketing team: Report 
Last updated: 27 Jun, 2017  

Jharkhand map THMB Opposition slams Jharkhand govt after Governor returns land amendments bill

Jharkhand map
   Top Stories
» 49% Indian startups now from tier 2, 3 cities: Jitendra Singh
» 'India ranks 3rd in global startup ecosystem & number of unicorns'
» Tripura exported over 9K tonnes of pineapples in 2 years
» CPI inflation eases to 6.71% in July, IIP falls to 12.3%
» Rupee depreciates 12 paise to close at 79.64 against US dollar
SME Times News Bureau | 27 Jun, 2017
A day after Jharkhand Governor Draupadi Murmu returned amendments to the two contentions land acts, opposition parties in Jharkhand on Monday said the BJP government should not "dare" bring in such amendments again in the state assembly.

"The state government should not commit such mistakes. The state assembly was misused to bring amendments in both the land acts. We welcome the Governor's decision as she understood the feelings of tribal community members," Hemant Soren, Jharkhand Mukti Morcha (JMM) Executive president and former Chief Minister, told reporters here on Monday.

"The state government should not dare to again bring the amendments otherwise we will again hit the roads to protest," he added.

He demanded that the Domicile Policy formulated last year should be redefined.

Former central Minister and Congress leader Subodh Kant Sahay, welcoming the Governor's decision, said: "This was a question of the existence of the traditions and culture of Jharkhand. The amendments were brought to help industrialists and it had nothing to do with the development of the state."

Jharkhand Governor Draupdi Murmu returned the amendments in the two land acts - Chotanagpur Tenancy (CNT) Act and Santhal Pargana Tenancy (SPT) Act. The amendments were passed by the state assembly by voice vote amid stiff protest by the opposition parties in the assembly in November last year. The opposition members while opposing the amendments had misbehaved with Speaker Dinesh Oraon when the amendments were tabled.

The Governor returned the amendment bills with a query asking "How the amendments will benefit the tribal people?"

The amendments in both the acts were pending with the Governor since November last year.

The opposition parties, Cardinal Telesphore Toppo and other tribal leaders had separately met the Governor and requested her not to clear the amendment bills.

According to sources in the government, 192 petitions were filed by different political parties and associations to Governor Murmu requesting her not to clear the amendments.

The amendments were opposed by the entire opposition and also BJP alliance partner All Jharkhand Students Union (AJSU). The amendments were also opposed by BJP legislators and Lok Sabha MPs.

Ignoring all opposition, the BJP government led by Ragubar Das had passed the amendments.

With the amendments, if approved by the Governor, agricultural land could be used for non agriculture purposes. The amendments had proposed that agricultural land can be acquired for development work, infrastructure and other works by the state government.

Since Governor Murmu returned the amendments, the state government has remained tight-lipped over the issue.
 
Print the Page Add to Favorite
 
Share this on :
 

Please comment on this story:
 
Subject :
Message:
(Maximum 1500 characters)  Characters left 1500
Your name:
 

 
  Customs Exchange Rates
Currency Import Export
US Dollar
66.20
64.50
UK Pound
87.50
84.65
Euro
78.25
75.65
Japanese Yen 58.85 56.85
As on 13 Aug, 2022
  Daily Poll
PM Modi's recent US visit to redefine India-US bilateral relations
 Yes
 No
 Can't say
  Commented Stories
» GIC Re's revenue from obligatory cession threatened(1)
 
 
About Us  |   Advertise with Us  
  Useful Links  |   Terms and Conditions  |   Disclaimer  |   Contact Us  
Follow Us : Facebook Twitter