Active Stocks
Thu Mar 28 2024 14:49:26
  1. Tata Steel share price
  2. 155.95 2.03%
  1. HDFC Bank share price
  2. 1,455.55 1.03%
  1. ITC share price
  2. 430.95 0.69%
  1. Power Grid Corporation Of India share price
  2. 278.75 2.84%
  1. State Bank Of India share price
  2. 756.00 2.99%
Business News/ Companies / News/  Ratan Tata refutes Cyrus Mistry’s allegations on Tata Nano
BackBack

Ratan Tata refutes Cyrus Mistry’s allegations on Tata Nano

Ratan Tata cites an email sent by Tata Motors CEO Guenter Butschek to Mistry mentioning that he had not objected to scrapping of the Nano

In the first nine months to fiscal 2016-17, Tata Nano sales dropped by 61% to 6,714 units from 17,258 units in the year-ago period. Photo: MintPremium
In the first nine months to fiscal 2016-17, Tata Nano sales dropped by 61% to 6,714 units from 17,258 units in the year-ago period. Photo: Mint

Mumbai: The Nano small car, a bone of contention in the tussle between Tata Sons Ltd’s interim chairman Ratan Tata and Cyrus Mistry, the ousted chairman, has now made it to the courtrooms.

Tata has defended his stance on the Nano and strongly denied allegations by Mistry that his (Tata’s) “persistent resistance" prevented the Nano project from being shelved.

In an affidavit filed at the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) on 6 January, Tata cited an email sent by Guenter Butschek, managing director and chief executive of Tata Motors Ltd, to Mistry, mentioning that Ratan Tata had not objected when the issue of scrapping the Nano was broached with him at a meeting.

The Nano was Tata’s pet project and Mistry has cited mounting losses from it—cumulatively valued at Rs6,400 crore—to be the key reason for the poor financial performance of Tata Motors’ domestic operations.

ALSO READ | How Tata Nano became ammunition for Mistry’s broadside against Ratan Tata

In an affidavit filed at the NCLT earlier this month, Mistry accused Tata of excessive interference in matters of Tata Motors and conducting reviews with company officials directly, undermining the position of the executive chairman of Tata Sons.

“Apart from aviation, his other personal passion was the automobile industry," Mistry said. He alleged that despite being fully aware that the Nano lost money, Ratan Tata pushed for increasing production of the car and “pestered for a higher marketshare". Mistry also said Tata suggested that Tata Motors chase large orders from cab aggregator Ola—in which Tata has a stake in his personal capacity—instead of Uber, with which the Tata group was pursuing an engagement.

Dismissing the allegations, Ratan Tata said in his affidavit that it was “unfortunate that my concern for Tata Motors would be coloured with a taint of ulterior motives on my part". Tata said he suggested that Tata Motors should talk to Ola only because he was approached by Ola’s co-founder, who told him the response from Tata Motors to Ola Cabs’ proposal to buy several cars was very slow. Tata Motors should act swiftly and pursue such a proposal aggressively to improve sales volumes, Tata claims he told Mistry. He also added that his letter to Mistry clearly stated that the company should pursue a deal with Uber if that was more attractive.

ALSO READ | N Chandrasekaran appointed Tata Motors chairman

Tata blamed Mistry for the drastic drop in the company’s passenger vehicle market share—from 13% when Tata was the chairman to 4-5% now. “It is very convenient for Mistry to allege that the losses and lack luster performance of Tata Motors is on account of the Nano, when even the present sales of the company largely comprise of the older models such as the Indica and the Indigo, with newer vehicles such as the Zest, Bolt and Tiago introduced during Misty’s tenure not contributing significantly to the sales or profit of Tata Motors," he said.

Mistry first made a mention of the small car and the big losses in the five-page letter to Tata Sons board on 25 October, a day after he was removed as chairman following a boardroom coup. “The Nano product development concept called for car below Rs1 lakh but the costs were always above this," wrote Mistry, pointing out that “there is no line of sight to profitability for the Nano and any turnaround strategy for the company requires to shut it down. Emotional reasons alone have kept us away from this crucial decision".

ALSO READ | New Tata Sons chairman has twin obstacles—a family and a conglomerate

The Nano hit Indian roads in July 2009. More than seven years since it went on sale, the jelly-bean shaped model has failed to woo the average two-wheeler owner and first-time car buyers, as envisaged by Tata, and sales continue to dwindle.

A Tata Sons spokesperson said he didn’t have anything more to add to what had been presented in the affidavit. Cyrus Mistry’s office declined to comment.

Tata Motors shares closed at Rs523.25 on Tuesday, down 0.63%, on a day the BSE’s benchmark Sensex fell 0.19% to 27,235.66 points.

Unlock a world of Benefits! From insightful newsletters to real-time stock tracking, breaking news and a personalized newsfeed – it's all here, just a click away! Login Now!

Catch all the Corporate news and Updates on Live Mint. Download The Mint News App to get Daily Market Updates & Live Business News.
More Less
Published: 17 Jan 2017, 10:33 AM IST
Next Story footLogo
Recommended For You
Switch to the Mint app for fast and personalized news - Get App

Chat with MintGenie