Rocking the ‘status quo’
On Wednesday last week, Sao Tome and Principe severed formal ties with Taiwan, some say as a result of China’s response to President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) recent telephone call with US president-elect Donald Trump and his questioning of the “one China” principle. China warned that more could follow.
However, Taiwanese do not seem overly concerned with this prospect.
There is surely something wrong if a nation does not care about its diplomatic partners. It could be explained by saying that Taiwanese recognize the diplomatic relations are between other nations and the exiled government of the Republic of China (ROC), and not Taiwan, which few other nations recognize as a nation. In the diplomatic tug-of-war between the ROC and the People’s Republic of China (PRC), those partners could even be seen as historical obstacles to the normalization of Taiwan.
Taiwan is not the ROC, nor is it part of China: it was ceded to the Japanese by the Qing emperor in 1895 under the Treaty of Shimonoseki and Japan renounced all rights, title and claim to Formosa and the Pescadores on Sept. 8, 1951, effective as of April 28, 1952 under the San Francisco Peace Treaty.
US Congress arranged the Taiwan Relations Act (TRA) in 1979 to help US maintain peace, security and stability in the western Pacific region; and to promote the foreign policy of the US by authorizing the continuation of commercial, cultural and other relations between the people of the US and the people on Taiwan. It is a clear implementation of US policy with regard to Taiwan that the US president is directed to inform Congress promptly of any threat to the security or the social or economic system of the people on Taiwan.
The TRA officially ceased to recognize the ROC, and only recognizes the government as the governing authorities in Taiwan. That should have been the end of the exiled ROC government in Taiwan.
Every US president since then has complied with the TRA in their dealings with Taiwan. On Dec. 16, US President Barack Obama defended the “status quo,” saying that Taiwanese had benefited from it, and added: “Taiwanese have agreed that as long as they are able to continue to function with some degree of autonomy, that they won’t charge forward and declare independence.”
He also urged his successor to beware of provoking a “very significant” response from Beijing over Taiwan.
Obama clearly interpreted the TRA in line with former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) naive personal view of Taiwan being part of China.
Trump has asked why he could not accept a phone call from Tsai and why the US should be bound by a “one China” policy. On Nov. 30, 1950, the UN Security Council rejected the official representative of the PRC Wu Xiuquan’s (伍修權) accusation that the US invaded its territory, Taiwan. The US has never recognized Taiwan as part of China.
Now is the perfect time to end diplomatic relations with the illusory ROC. Taiwan is not an independent nation with sovereignty. There is no Republic of Taiwan, nor is there a Taiwanese Constitution. Former vice president Annette Lu (呂秀蓮) said that Taiwan is an independent nation, but did not actually name the nation. Obama called Taiwan an entity, simply stating a reality that we need to accept for now.
Next year could well be a remarkable one for Taiwan. The “status quo” is teetering. Why should Taiwanese accept the ROC Constitution when it is rejected by China? The government should write a new Taiwanese constitution.
Obama has signed the US National Defense Authorization Act into law, authorizing top military exchanges between US and Taiwan. Is Taiwan ready for the change? Tsai should be proud of been having been elected as president of Taiwan, not the ROC. We will have to wait and see where she takes it from here.
John Hsieh
Hayward California
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry