HC wants panel to vet pleas of temples for repair

Directs amicus curiae to make suggestions on essential work from the perspective of architecture as well as ‘agamas’

October 26, 2016 12:00 am | Updated December 02, 2016 11:39 am IST - CHENNAI:

Last year, the court directed the HR & CE department to go slow in matters of renovation.

Last year, the court directed the HR & CE department to go slow in matters of renovation.

The Madras High Court on Tuesday observed that it would be appropriate to appoint a committee of experts to consider applications from temples seeking permission to carry out “essential works,” since the court had earlier directed the Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department (HR&CE) to “go slow” in the matter of renovation for the time being.

“Individual temples are seeking to carry out what they call essential works. This court has already permitted essential works. As to what is essential work is itself causing concern in difference of perception,” the First Bench of Chief Justice S.K. Kaul and Justice R. Mahadevan said while hearing a suo motu PIL proceeding initiated based on media reports highlighting improper renovation works being undertaken by State government resulting in damage to heritage structures.

The Bench directed the amicus curiae to look into the issue and make suggestions to the court keeping in mind the requirement of essential work, from the perspective of architecture as well as ‘agamas’ and posted the PIL to November 4 for further hearing.

On November 30, 2015, the court directed the HR & CE Department to go slow in matters of renovation till a proper path is laid ahead and not to destroy heritage structures. Following the direction, around 13 temples, including Sri Ranganathaswamy temple, Srirangam, moved the court to permit them to carry out essential works in the temples.

On July 5, the court allowed temple managements to carry out essential works with a clarification that the term ‘essential works’ meant work that cannot brook delay, as the structure itself may collapse in the meantime.

Earlier, the court allowed essential works that cannot be delayed if the structure is in danger of collapsing

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.