IFPRI- Food Security of Women in Tribal Rajasthan- Manisha Kabra
1. Ms. Manisha Kabra, Freedom from Hunger India Trust
Dr. Arindam Das, IHMR University, Institute of Health Management Research
Ms. Bobbi. L. Gray, Freedom from Hunger, USA
Towards ‘Gender—Transformative’
Food security for Tribal Rajasthan
2. Gender & Food Security
Close correlation between high levels of gender
inequality and food insecurity, malnutrition and
other nutritional deficiencies
60% of malnourished people globally are women
and girls
Inter- and intra-generational and intra-household
food insecurity persists
Despite economic growth in India, stunting and
undernutrition have not improved; known as India
Enigma
3. Rajasthan
50% of women and adolescent girls suffer from anemia
36% children below 5 years are stunted, girls are more
stunted (31%) than boys (27%)
Poor women’s empowerment, Rajasthan index score of
0.4; national is 0.5 on 0-1 scale
Stunting is the highest among children of tribal region
(54%) compared to children of non-tribal region (45%)
4. Purpose of Presentation
Purpose of presentation:
explore the relationship between household food
security and gender among women from tribal
communities in rural Rajasthan
discuss the implications for practices and policies
that target a more gender-transformative food-
secure world
5. Rajasthan Nutrition Program
Actors: Freedom from Hunger India Trust,
VAAGDHARA, PRADAN, Chetna
Program: Integration of agriculture, nutrition, financial
services and gender
Location: Two tribal districts in Banswara and Sirohi
6. Baseline Assessment Methods
Baseline study:
May –June 2015
403 women in self-help groups
Simple random sample among mothers with children ages
0-2; pregnant women (20%)
Data collection: consultants from IHMR University Jaipur
Data analysis: Brigham Young University, USA & IHMR
University
Statistical associations between food security, breastfeeding behaviors,
use of ICDS centers and household decision-making, autonomy
Autonomy index= Cronbach’s alpha (.738), reliable scale
7. Survey Content
Household poverty level: $1.25/day, National Poverty Line
Food security: four-point food security scale
Coping strategies Index
Dietary Diversity Index
Sanitation and safe water
Curative care; treatment-seeking behaviors (use of ORS, etc.)
Household decision making
Utilization of ICDS services
Breastfeeding/Infant feeding
8. Results (1)
Majority of survey participants were Hindu (99.8%)
44.7% live below IPL $1.25; 94.2% live below IPL $2.50/day;
34.6% live below the NPL.
77% children of household were food insecure; 79% of women
were food insecure
61% women reported using ICDS benefit in the prior 12
months (primarily immunization and supplementary foods)
47% were breastfed in the first hour; 28% exclusively breastfed
for six months
9. Results (2)
Gender Percent
Wife makes decision:
on food purchases 19.6
about how much food to serve family members 40.5
on how money is spent 5.2
on whether she seeks healthcare for herself 3.5
on whether she can visit family or friends 4.2
Spoke to husband in past 6 months regarding food needs 71.2
Spend money most of the time without discussing with
husband first
27.5
Mobility
Can go to market alone 28.3
Can go to health facility alone 23.3
Can visit friends or family within the village alone 37.7
Can visit friends or family outside of the village alone 11.9
10. Results (3)
1. Accessibility to ICDS services significantly associated
with 3/14 gender variables: decision making of food
quantity to be served within household, had spoken to
husband about household nutrition needs, spends
money without first discussing with someone else
2. Food security was sig. assoc. with 8/14 gender
variables: all the decision-making variables, unrestricted
access to income, household finances, fear of husbands
11. Results (4)
3. Initial breastfeeding: only associated with
decisionmaking regarding visits to family
4. Exclusive Breastfeeding sig. assoc. with 6/14
gender variables: joint decisions with their
husbands regarding finances, healthcare decisions,
and decisions regarding visiting family, have
spoken to their spouse of household nutrition
needs, have unrestricted access to income
14. Conclusions (1)
Gender matters for food security, access to
ICDS services, breastfeeding (mainly exclusive)
Women’s and children’s food security status
were similar and both were associated with a
woman’s level of autonomy
15. Conclusions (2)
What does this mean for how we design for
improving food security as well as measure it?
Definitions of food security are quite
multidimensional
Yet most measures look at access; not intra-
household distribution of food
Very few existing tools include a gender dimension
that are practitioner-friendly
16. Conclusions (3)
Great opportunity exists to improve household
food security
not by simply improving food supply
but also by addressing the “social access” dimension
= improving the autonomy of women for resource
allocation and resource management at the
household- and community-level
17. Conclusions (4)
Need more collaboration between government,
ICDS centres, community-based organizations, and
self-help groups
Multidimensional definitions of food security
require multidimensional approaches (ag, financial
services, gender, nutrition, etc.)
Have to engage men and boys, not just women.
The findings helped to assess the needs for
interventions and planning gender based
approaches.
18. • RNP led the torch with cadre of 1280 community
volunteers (SHG members)called as Community
Nutrition advocates in two districts , who are trained in
gender based approaches. They develop skills among
Community members for gender and nutrition, IYCF,
maternal adolescent health, service linkages and
financial literacy to engage in dialogue with men to
improve household nutrition.
Gender transformative Theory of
change in RNP
19. I have held a pen/crayon for the first time in my life.
I have never drawn on a paper will show this to my children
I have given my introduction in this way for the first time.
I have never been asked about my likes and dislikes
Will my “Thali “ be filled like man’s?
Gender dynamics has particularly influenced food and household food security transforming gender as social construct beyond the biological dimension. Research has demonstrated the close correlation between high levels of gender inequality and food insecurity, malnutrition and other nutritional deficiencies.
At least 60% of malnourished people globally are women and girls experiencing the impact of persisting inter- and intra –generational and intra household food insecurity. “India Enigma”, describes the paradox existence where improvements in Stunting and under nutrition have not kept pace with economic growth encompassing actually higher rate of malnutrition than some locations in Sub-Saharan Africa.
In Rajasthan, 50% of women and adolescent girls suffer from Anemia, 36% children below 5 years are stunted and girls are more stunted(31%) then boys(27%) leading to poor gender empowerment index of 0.4 below national average of 0.5 on a scale of 0-1 depicting poor woman’s empowerment status. Stunting is the highest among children of tribal region (54%)compared to children of non-tribal region (45%), clearly indicating gender discrimination in intra- household feeding patterns.
In Rajasthan
Freedom from Hunger India trust, together with it’s Implementing NGOs, VAAGDHARA and PRADAN are currently collaborating to improve household nutrition through integration of agriculture, nutrition, financial services and Gender in two tribal districts namely –Banswara and Sirohi respectively, under the aegis of the project, “Empowering Poor marginalized women in Rajasthan for Gender-Equitable Household Nutrition” also known as Rajasthan Nutrition project.
The paper as being presented to the forum seeks to
Explore the relationship between household food security and gender among tribal communities in Rajasthan utilizing data from baseline assessment, conducted in May –June 2015 with 403 women belonging to Self help groups in the selected districts.
Discuss the implications for practices and policies that target a more gender transformative food secure world.
May –June 2015
403 women in self-help groups
Simple random sample among mothers with children ages 0-2; pregnant women (20%)
Data collection: consultants from IHMR University Jaipur.
Data analysis: Brigham Young University, USA & IHMR University
: Progress out of Poverty Index progress out of poverty Index scorecard developed by the Grameen foundation. The International Poverty line (IPL)$1.25/day, IPL$ 2.50/day and National Tendulkar indices were constructed using values of India progress out of poverty index.
2). Food security was measured on the basis of four point food security scale of Freedom From hunger ,classifying food secure, food insecure without hunger, food insecure with moderate hunger and food insecure with severe hunger. Food security for children was also assessed based on the same scale.
3.)Health and nutrition status of the women and household was assessed using a set of health indicators, coping strategies index, dietary diversity index, nutrition, sanitation and safe water, curative care, household decision making , Utilization of ICDS services and breastfeeding/Infant feeding.
C
61% women reported using ICDS benefit in the prior 12 months (, mainly immunization and supplementary foods. Least services utilized were breastfeeding education and support.
Breastfeeding–47 % were breastfed in the first hour and 28% were exclusively breastfed for six months and 66% were also given something else beside smother’s milk.
Gender- In this baseline study, women appear to have the most decision making power (41%), to decide about serving food.The decisions were found to be taken by husband/ male members Food purchases, medical treatment, and travel
Gender, particularly intra-household dynamics such as decision-making power of women, their autonomy, communication and their relationship with their spouse, matters for food security as well as for important health and nutrition behaviors such as accessing ICDS services and for initial and exclusive breastfeeding.
Gender, particularly intra-household dynamics such as decision-making power of women, their autonomy, communication and their relationship with their spouse, matters for food security as well as for important health and nutrition behaviors such as accessing ICDS services and for initial and exclusive breastfeeding.
Gender, particularly intra-household dynamics such as decision-making power of women, their autonomy, communication and their relationship with their spouse, matters for food security as well as for important health and nutrition behaviors such as accessing ICDS services and for initial and exclusive breastfeeding.
Gender, particularly intra-household dynamics such as decision-making power of women, their autonomy, communication and their relationship with their spouse, matters for food security as well as for important health and nutrition behaviors such as accessing ICDS services and for initial and exclusive breastfeeding.