Three years later, few passengers, fewer incentives

September 26, 2016 12:00 am | Updated November 01, 2016 09:07 pm IST

Vijender Saini, 28

Barola village, Noida

As Vijender Saini’s wait for a potential fare near a sprawling commercial complex in Noida’s Sector 132 entered its fifth hour, the 28-year-old animatedly recalled his initial days behind the steering wheel of a sedan attached to a prominent app-based taxi service.

“You see this circle around the blue blimp which means this car?” he asked pointing to the screen of his smartphone attached to a holder stuck on the windshield. “It used to be filled with duties (potential customers) any time of the day and at any given location in the National Capital Region (NCR) when I switched on my device three years ago. Look at it now; nothing. Kaam hai hi nahin (there is simply no work),” he said, his smile wearing off.

Over the last three years, Saini, a resident of Noida’s urbanised Barola village, said he was among lakhs of “average drivers” based in the NCR who rode the “Uber-Ola bubble” to what now “seems to be its conclusion”.

The rush of being “flooded with work” which had greeted their move onto the web-app platform in the name of the “changing times” and attractive incentives has, three years later, become “a daily struggle” given the massive numerical increase of his peers, “more uncertainty” in the rate chart and the risk of “customers with behavioural problems” opting for shared rides.

“Surge pricing may sound like a crime, like something extra that we are fleecing out of our customers without their knowledge, but the truth is that it was the only reason that made this job worthwhile and kept the effect of the increasing number of cabs on the streets uniform and fair for everyone,” he said.

“It was like winning a lottery for both the driver and the passenger; sure the customer would need to pay a little extra but that extra money also ensured instant service. Since surge pricing was banned (in Delhi), both drivers and customers are bearing the brunt,” he added.

The fare-sharing system, which has replaced both surge-pricing and target-linked incentives in relation to the total number of trips being undertaken by a driver, he said has made eking a living more physically exhausting and uncertain for drivers.

The need of the hour, he said, was a fixed rate chart for vehicles even as he complained about “lack of basic courtesy” he routinely observed among passengers opting for shared rides.

“Things have become very difficult for drivers like me who drive sedans which should be operated on higher fares compared to smaller cars. My EMI is higher than a smaller car, but I earn the same fare as the driver of a smaller car. What’s worse is the way fare-sharing passengers behave with each other,” he said.

“I recently ferried a pregnant passenger and a smoker heading to the same location. The man showed no concern for the health of the other occupant and refused to stub his cigarette despite being asked politely. Thankfully, for the lady, it was a short trip,” he said.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.