Summary: Social media have evolved as a key territory for modern political campaigning. Political actors (candidates and parties) operating in this territory have to adjust their communication strategies to a new logic, allowing citizen to directly engage with and respond to political actors’ messages. Research in political campaigning has identified different context and content factors which drive or dampen user responses (likes, shares, comments). I will discuss key findings of these studies and present an example study conducted in Austria.
2. raffael.heiss@univie.ac.at
Social
Media
Use
Every
day
ac0vi0es
on
social
media
ARD/ZDF
Online
Study,
2013
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Seeking
news
Pos0ng
Links
Videos
Commen0ng
Looking
at
Pictures
Checking
out
other
people's
ac0vi0es
Personal
messages
3. raffael.heiss@univie.ac.at
Social
Media
Use
General
news
use
on
social
media
Pew
Research
Center,
2015
40
45
50
55
60
65
2013
2015
%
of
Users
Ge:ng
News
on
Twi>er/Facebook
TwiRer
Facebook
4. raffael.heiss@univie.ac.at
Social
Media
Use
US
Presiden0al
campaign
Pew
Research
Center,
2016
Social
media
are
the
most
important
informa0on
source
for
young
people
between
18
and
30
years
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Network
nightly
news
Local
TV
Cable
TV
News
Websites
Social
Media
18-‐29
30-‐49
50-‐64
5. raffael.heiss@univie.ac.at
Social
Media
Use
Some
cri0cal
research
findings…
Social
media
users
feel
well-‐informed
–
but
they
are
actually
not!
(Müller,
2015)
SNS
ac0vi0es
are
slack0vist,
do
not
increase
knowledge
(Baumgartner
et
al.,
2010)
Low
quality
of
online
news
(de
Vreese
et
al.,
2016)
and
disinforma0on
(Gundecha et al., 2013)
8. raffael.heiss@univie.ac.at
Poli0cians
on
SM
Example
Study
Populists
work
with
simple
messages,
nega?vity
and
nega?ve
emo?ons
What
other
elements
can
drive
user
engagement,
and
hence
successful
campaigning
on
Facebook?
9. raffael.heiss@univie.ac.at
Study:
User
Engagement
What
drives
users’
reac0ons
in
poli0cians’
Facebook
posts
6
Par0es
84
Poli0cians
1949
Posts
Analysis
of
Poli8cal
Actors‘
Facebook
Profiles
and
Posts
Time:
6
months
Comments,
Likes,
Shares?
11. raffael.heiss@univie.ac.at
Differences
between
profile
types
Differences
between
par0es
Effect
of
pos0ng
ac0vity
Nega0vity,
Emo0ons,
Humor
Delibera0ve
elements
Issues,
Mobiliza0on
Study:
User
Engagement
What
drives
users’
reac0ons
in
poli0cians’
Facebook
Posts
Post
Level
Profile
Level
13. raffael.heiss@univie.ac.at
Study
Example
Profile
level:
Profile
types
&
par0es
Comments
Likes
Shares
Organiza0on
(vs.
Fan
profile)
Private
profile
(vs.
Fan
profile)
✔
➖
✖
➖
✖
✖
No
effect
of
party
No
effect
of
profile
ac0vity
18. raffael.heiss@univie.ac.at
Study
Example
Delibera0ve
elements
Reasoning
✔
Other
party
actors
✔
✖
Post
length
✔
✔
References:
Own
party
➖
✖
✖
✔
✖
✔
➖
Comments
Likes
Shares
26. raffael.heiss@univie.ac.at
Learnings
On
a
more
general
level….
Social
media
and
poli0cal
sophis0ca0on
not
per
se
contradictory
Great
responsibility
of
those
who
use
the
channels
for
campaigning
How
can
we
advance
content
management
to
counter
populist
tendencies?
28. raffael.heiss@univie.ac.at
References
Baumgartner,
J.
C.,
&
Morris,
J.
S.
(2009).
MyFaceTube
poli0cs:
Social
networking
web
sites
and
poli0cal
engagement
of
young
adults.
Social
Science
Computer
Review.
Busemann,
K.
(2013).
Wer
nutzt
was
im
Social
Web.
Media
Perspek?ven,
44(7/8),
391-‐399.
De
Vreese,
C.H.,
Esser,
F.
&
Hopmann
D.N.
(eds),
Comparing
Poli?cal
Journalism.
London:
Routledge.
Gundecha,
P.,
Feng,
Z.,
&
Liu,
H.
(2013,
October).
Seeking
provenance
of
informa0on
using
social
media.
In
Proceedings
of
the
22nd
ACM
interna?onal
conference
on
Informa?on
&
Knowledge
Management
(pp.
1691-‐1696).
ACM.
Müller,
P.
(2015):
Just
feeling
being
informed?
Social
Network
Sites
und
tatsächliches
und
wahrgenommenes
poli0sches
Wissen.
Presenta0on
at
the
DGPUK
2015.
Pew
Research
Center.
(2015,
July
14).
The
evolving
role
of
news
on
TwiQer
and
Facebook.
Pew
Research
Center.
(2016,
February
4).
The
2016
presiden?al
campaign:
A
news
event
that’s
hard
to
miss.