Defence has revealed few details of the 2013 incident.
Camera IconDefence has revealed few details of the 2013 incident. Credit: Supplied

Nine sanctioned after gun drawn during ADF drinking session in Afghanistan

News Corp Australia

A DRINKING session at the Australian embassy in ­Afgh­anistan in which an Australian special forces soldier pulled a gun on a female spy has resulted in “administrative sanctions” for nine Australian Defence Force members.

Defence has revealed few details of the 2013 incident involving a Special Air Services Regiment soldier and a female member of the Australian ­Secret Intelligence Service (ASIS) during a booze-up at the embassy in Kabul.

“Given the relatively small number of people who were deployed to this particular mission at the time, Defence will not disclose the specific sanctions imposed,” a spokesman said.

That could have included a formal warning, a censure, ­removal from duty, reduction in rank or involuntary termination of service.

Get in front of tomorrow's news for FREE

Journalism for the curious Australian across politics, business, culture and opinion.

READ NOW

Defence received allegations in December 2013 of ­misconduct by some of its ­personnel on operations, launching an inquiry into the allegations and other misconduct claims.

Few other details have been revealed.

It’s claimed that a special forces soldier, reported to be a member of the SAS Regiment, allegedly pulled a loaded handgun on a female agent during a drinking session at the Australian embassy in Kabul.

The intelligence services watchdog, the Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security (IGIS), examined ASIS’s part in this, plus the broader issue of ASIS officers and procedures involving the use of side-arms.

Its 2013-14 annual report noted that ASIS didn’t have adequate controls to ensure an agent wouldn’t be carrying a weapon while under the influence of alcohol. ASIS accepted and implemented all the inspector-general’s recommendations with IGIS lamenting that it could not say more.

“It is difficult for the office to continue to demonstrate rigorous and credible oversight given the strict limitations on public reporting,” its annual ­report said.

Defence head Air Chief Marshal Mark Binskin added a few more details during a Senate estimates committee hearing last year, confirming that one of those charged was the soldier who drew the weapon.

Others charged were not necessarily involved in the actual incident, he said.

The case was referred to the Australian Defence Force Investigative Service and then to the Director of Military Prosecutions who passed it back to the army for administrative action.

IN OTHER NEWS: ‘I WILL NOT LET TIA’S DEATH BE IN VAIN’