Coordination panel hasn’t met in a year even as controversies dog govt.

The panel was formed in 2013 to bring about better understanding between govt. and the party

May 25, 2016 12:00 am | Updated September 12, 2016 08:30 pm IST - BENGALURU:

BANGALORE, 15/04/2013: Congress party candidate for Basavanagudi B.K. Chandrashekar after filing his nomination papers in Bangalore on April 15, 2013.
Photo: K. Bhagya Prakash

BANGALORE, 15/04/2013: Congress party candidate for Basavanagudi B.K. Chandrashekar after filing his nomination papers in Bangalore on April 15, 2013. Photo: K. Bhagya Prakash

In the backdrop of Congress’ poor performance in the recently concluded Assembly polls, its dependence on Karnataka — the biggest amongst the few States it holds power in — has tremendously increased. But the State Congress leaders and the State government seem to continue with their infighting unabated.

Despite serious controversies faced by the government and the Chief Minister, there seems to be little effort to revive a mechanism that could ensure better coordination between the party leadership and the State government, according to several senior leaders who have now begun voicing their concern openly.

They pointed out that the coordination panel constituted soon after the Congress came to power in 2013 in Karnataka, to bring about a better understanding between the party and its government, has not met for a year now. This is despite the government facing controversies regarding the formation of Anti-Corruption Bureau, corruption allegations, and agrarian crisis.

The panel, headed by AICC general secretary in-charge of Karnataka Digvijaya Singh, was constituted to ensure that the government, in particular Chief Minister Siddaramaiah, does not take unilateral decisions on major policy matters.

Several controversial decisions such as the formation of the ACB, appointments to the Lokayukta and Karnataka Public Service Commission (KPSC), selection of party candidate for the Hebbal constituency, and execution of Netravati diversion project could have been resolved amicably if the panel had discussed them, according to former Minister and KPCC vice-president B.K. Chandrashekar.

The panel was mandated to meet every month.

Besides Mr. Singh, Home Minister and KPCC president G. Parameshwara (convener), Mr. Siddaramaiah, Energy Minister D.K. Shivakumar, Bengaluru Development Minister K.J. George, and AICC secretaries in-charge of Karnataka Selva Kumar and Shantakumar Naik are the other panel members.

The government has done a commendable job on the drought front and implementation of some schemes. Striking a good balance between the party and the government would have further enhanced the government’s image in public, said Prof. Chandrashekar.

His comments come in the backdrop of several veteran leaders such as former Union Minister B. Janardhana Poojary, former Chief Minister S.M. Krishna, the former Minister A.H. Vishwanath, criticising Mr. Siddaramaiah, particularly his style of functioning.

However, sources close to Mr. Siddaramaiah pointed out that “if given space”, several Congress leaders insist on interfering in every administrative decision, making it virtually impossible to govern the State. They argued that the Chief Minister has been in constant touch with the party high command and has a clear brief on this matter. Sources also pointed out that Mr. Siddaramaiah’s position seems have become stronger as the party high command, post the defeat in Tamil Nadu, West Bengal, Kerala and Assam, is in no mood to unsettle the situation in Karnataka.

Several controversial decisions could have been resolved amicably if the panel had discussed them. Striking a good balance between the party and the government would have further enhanced the latter’s image in public

B.K. Chandrashekar,KPCC vice-president

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.