Sharif family should face inquiry first in Panamagate scandal, say lawyers

Legal fraternity gives parliamentary panel 15 days to thrash out ToRs for inquiry commission


Hasnaat Malik May 22, 2016
PHOTO: AFP

ISLAMABAD: Top representatives of the lawyers’ fraternity have demanded that the investigation into Panamagate scandal should be started from the Sharif family.

The demand was made in a unanimous resolution adopted at a lawyers’ convention organised by the Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) on Saturday. The resolution says the investigation should start from Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif and his children, three of which, according to the Panama Papers, own offshore companies in a tax haven.

PM Nawaz visits Gilani House to garner support on Panama leaks

“[The proposed inquiry commission must] find out if he [the prime minister] has invested or owned any offshore properties or some crime or wrongdoing has been done inclusive of the trail of money/funds and reconciliation with the declarations before the Election Commission of Pakistan and income/wealth tax authorities from 1-1-1985 till date,” reads the resolution.

The legal community gave two-week time to the 12-member parliamentary panel to formulate the terms of reference (ToRs) for the commission with consensus. If the parliamentary panel fails to thrash out the ToRs within the deadline, then the legal community will be ‘forced’ to take steps to have this matter of public interest concluded in a workable and effective manner, it says.

Pakistan Bar Council Vice Chairman Farogh Nasim said if the parliamentary committee did not formulate ToRs within 15 days, the legal fraternity could use all options, including a street movement as well as filing a petition under Article 184(3).

The resolution says the inquiry should be restricted to parliamentarians and holders of public office ‘as they have to conform’ to the requirements of Articles 62 and 63 of the Constitution, and not against businessmen or loan defaulters, who have not been lawmakers or holders of public office.

It urges Chief Justice of Pakistan Anwar Zaheer Jamali to nominate two eminent judges, sitting or retired, of the Supreme Court, and a legal expert of eminence as members of the commission.

Panama Leaks: Inquiry should be limited to PM and his family, says Siraj

The lawyers suggest the time period for completion of the investigation should be two months extendable to a maximum of six months from the date of commencement of the investigation. “The commission shall cease to exist once it has finalised the investigation. However, no member of the commission shall be removed until the commission ceases to exist when the investigation is finalised or when the period of six months has elapsed.”

The resolution says the commission should publish and shall make public its findings and conclusions itself without any reference to the government of Pakistan. The hearings of the commission shall be open and transparent.

It recommends that the commission should have the power to constitute an international joint investigation team or teams and to seek cooperation from foreign agencies to provide information, documents, evidence and record from abroad.

“[In this regard it may direct] the government of Pakistan to move the mutual legal assistance requests or otherwise request for cooperation and assistance in the investigation or issue letters derogatory in accordance with the United Nations Convention Against Corruption,” it says.

Published in The Express Tribune, May 22nd, 2016.

COMMENTS (3)

Parvez | 7 years ago | Reply Correct demand....and should be accepted as the Prime Minister correctly offered himself for accountability in his address to the nation a few days after the Panama Leaks disclosure. he is the Prime Minister and any smear on his name is a smear on the office of the Prime Minister and must be cleared.
Aftab Islam | 7 years ago | Reply The inquiry must investigate the source of all assets because in most cases wealth in Pakistan is generated through massive theft and corruption. It is not just taxes on this illegally acquired wealth. The entire amount of wealth has to be taken back as it belongs to the state.
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ