More questions than answers in school report
Updated: 2016-04-27 09:00
By Zhang Tiankan(China Daily USA)
|
|||||||||
THE CHANGZHOU SCANDAL, in which over 900 students were diagnosed with health problems after their school moved to a piece of land near where there used to be chemical plants, continues to make headlines. The local authorities have issued a report concluding the school's water and environmental conditions "meet State standards". However, the report uses rather vague words and expressions, according to Zhang Tiankan, a former research fellow at the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences:
An official report is supposed to answer questions, but the one issued by Changzhou officials only raises new ones.
For example, they said that 35 students suffer from "superficial lymphadenectasis, mostly caused by infection".
Many things, such as bacteria, viruses, parasites, fungus, and mycoplasma, cause infections; without pointing out which is the true cause, the report cannot lead to any valuable conclusion about whether the students' health problems are the result of contaminated land.
Saying the students are "infected" is like saying they are "ill", which does not pinpoint the cause of the problem.
Besides, the official report contains the conclusion that "the health conditions and drinking water of the school meet State standards". Can they be any vaguer than that?
Take drinking water for example, currently the State standards include 106 tests, which include the quantity of microorganisms, the concentration of inorganic poisonous chemicals, as well as organic poisonous chemicals.
Only when samples of drinking water meet all the standards, can we say the water meets State standards. The official report does not contain any data about the tests so its conclusion is hardly persuasive.
In particular, it has been claimed that the level of chlorobenzene in the underground water where the school is located is 94,799 times higher than the permitted level. Yet the official report fails to list the concentration of this highly toxic chemical. How can such a report win trust from the public?
More astonishingly, the report is based on materials provided by local officials. Yet such materials might be outdated and the students' symptoms might change with time.
If the local government hopes to restore public trust, instead of creating more panic among the public, they need to be transparent and reveal all the facts.
(China Daily USA 04/27/2016 page11)
- EU pledges 20 mln euros to nuclear safety fund
- DPRK seems set to launch Musudan ballistic missile
- Austria far right freezes out coalition in presidency race
- Chernobyl's 30th anniversary: Living under radiation
- S. Korea denounces DPRK's missile test
- Saudi-led coalition says kills more than 800 al-Qaida militants in Yemen
- Human-like robots say 'hi' to President Xi
- Animals turn savvy earners from entertainers
- Slackline walker conquers Tiger Jumping Gorge
- Top 6 domestic new-energy vehicles at Beijing auto show
- 30th anniversary of the Chernobyl nuclear disaster marked
- Shanghai unveils Disney-themed plane and station
- Hebei's poverty-stricken village gets new look after Xi's visit
- Cooks get creative with spring food exhibition in central China
Most Viewed
Editor's Picks
Anti-graft campaign targets poverty relief |
Cherry blossom signal arrival of spring |
In pictures: Destroying fake and shoddy products |
China's southernmost city to plant 500,000 trees |
Cavers make rare finds in Guangxi expedition |
Cutting hair for Longtaitou Festival |
Today's Top News
Liang avoids jail in shooting death
China's finance minister addresses ratings downgrade
Duke alumni visit Chinese Embassy
Marriott unlikely to top Anbang offer for Starwood: Observers
Chinese biopharma debuts on Nasdaq
What ends Jeb Bush's White House hopes
Investigation for Nicolas's campaign
Will US-ASEAN meeting be good for region?
US Weekly
Geared to go |
The place to be |