Justice Raja Elango of the Hyderabad High Court on Monday stayed all further proceedings currently under progress before the CBI Special Court in Hyderabad against Hetero Pharma Company in the disproportionate assets case of Y.S. Jaganmohan Reddy.
The judge also stayed the case against the company’s director Srinivas Reddy in the same case. The judge was passing these interim orders in a petition filed by the Hetero and its director. They said that land was given on lease by the APIIC and was not alienated.
The CBI had registered case unnecessarily. There was no conspiracy and no wrongful gain. The judge directed the CBI to file its counter and posted the case to June while staying the case against the company and its director.
Hospital panels
A division bench of Hyderabad High Court comprising Acting Chief Justice Dilip B. Bhosale and Justice P. Naveen Rao on Tuesday reserved orders in a case filed challenging the new rules pertaining to hospital management committees.
The cases were filed by Raghupati, YSRCP, MLA from Bapatla and others. They complained that the G.O. issued on May 13, 2015 was meant to accommodate ruling party leaders.
The new rules provided for nomination of representatives from reputed NGO / Philanthropist and two members having a background and experience of social work, social mobilization activities for weaker sections etc., and also president / secretary from Mandal or Urban Mahila Samakhya of the town in the management committee.
The government defended its action. The bench reserved orders.
Status quo
A division bench of Hyderabad High Court comprising Acting Chief Justice Dilip B. Bhosale and Justice P. Naveen Rao passed status quo orders regarding the land acquired for establishing Pharma City and Special Economic Zones at Nakkapalli in Visakhapatnam District.
The bench was dealing with a writ appeal filed by Nakkapalli Nirvasitula Sankshema Sangham. It was contended that such wholesale acquisition will render the local population shelter less. The procedure contemplated under the Land acquisition Act was not followed. A single judge had dismissed the case. The writ appeal was admitted by the bench and granted status quo and posted the case to July for detailed hearing.
