Essay writing is traditionally seen as a solitary endeavor but, as MIT states in their informative peer review video, ‘no one writes alone’. However, collaborative writing goes beyond giving feedback to co-authorship.
In recent years, group essay writing has become a feature of undergraduate courses and is consequently an area of EAP that requires attention. We will discuss the rationale for introducing group essays into an EAP course at the University of Macau and describe how the task was structured. We will reflect on the pilot course, identifying what worked effectively and what needed to change to better scaffold the process for students. We will also include a summary of students’ responses to group essay writing, which helps identify the wider learning gains that can be achieved from collaborative writing.
We will close the talk with an outline of the framework we introduced in the second year to mitigate some of the potential issues with group writing and maximize the positives. This framework could be used by fellow EAP teachers who wish to introduce group writing projects that will help their students develop academic skills like critical thinking, writing multiple drafts and self and peer reflection but also encourage the development of soft skills in the form of communication, time management and teamwork as well as transferable skills such as problem solving and negotiation.
4. Rationale for Collaborative Essays
• Group writing is widespread in universities (Scotland,
2016)
• Group writing has added benefits e.g. teamwork &
critical thinking (Shin, 2015)
• Group writing leads to better quality essays than
individual writing (Wigglesworth & Storch, 2009;
Shehadeh, 2011)
• Results in better task fulfilment, grammatical accuracy
and complexity (Storch, 2005; Mulligan & Garofalo, 2011)
• Results in better grades (Mulligan & Garofalo, 2011;
Berry, 2007)
• Group-work helps with employability (Wigglesworth &
Storch, 2009)
5. How it worked
Groups of three
Mixed gender,
mixed language,
mixed major
No pre-assigned
roles
6. The Essay Process: Pilot Year
Notes on a
source
(individual)
Outline
(group)
Paragraph
(individual)
First draft
(group)
Second draft
(group)
Final Draft
(group)
7. Increase individual writing in
course
Monitor of group-work process
Emphasize planning and use of
online tools
Mix of group and individual
marks
Majority of students engage fully
in group essays
Reflecting on Common Concerns
Insufficient amount of writing
Uneven workload/unequal
contribution
Timing: students don’t meet
outside of class
Unfair/over-generous grade due
to other students
Opposition by students
8. The Essay Process: Year 2
Moodle discussion of
input texts (individual)
Group ground rules
(group)
‘Stormboard’
discussion of potential
sources (group)
Mini bibliography
(individual)
Outline (group)
First draft (group)
Group work stop,
check, reflect
(individual)
Tutorial (group) Second draft (group)
Peer feedback
(individual)
Final Draft (group)
Group-work reflection
(individual)
10. ‘I understand what makes a good
essay’
Agree completely Agree
Disagree Disagree completely
Agree completely Agree
Disagree Disagree completely
Pilot Year
168 students
Year 2
194 students
11. ‘I am better at essay writing’
Agree completely Agree
Disagree Disagree completely
Agree completely Agree
Disagree Disagree completely
Pilot Year
167 students
Year 2
193 students
12. ‘I would recommend group essays’
Yes No NA Yes No NA
Pilot Year
169 students
Year 2
195 students
13. Reasons for recommendation
No
More ideas (5)
More disagreements (4)
More time (3)
Not equal distribution of
work (3)
More difficult (1)
Yes
More ideas (45)
Develop teamwork (40)
Share opinions (25)
Share workload (19)
Write a better essay (19)
Develop communication
skills (18)
PilotYear
14. Reasons for recommendation
No
Hard to organize ideas
(8)
Can’t show personal
ability (6)
More ideas (6)
More disagreements (5)
Not equal distribution of
work (4)
Yes
More ideas (59)
Better essay (38)
Share opinions (34)
Improve quality of ideas
(34)
Support & learn from each
other (33)
Develop teamwork (30)
Year2
15. Conclusion
• Logistics is the least important reason to do
collaborative essays.
• Group essays can not be approached in the same
way as individual essays.
• Less marking but more monitoring.
• With teacher support, collaborative essay
assignments can be very successful.
• Collaborative essays develop more than just essay
writing skills.
• Wider learning gains should be explicit objectives.
16. Bibliography
Berry, E. (2007). Group work and assessment—benefit or burden?. The Law Teacher, 41(1), 19-36.
Li, M., & Campbell, J. (2008). Asian students’ perceptions of group work and group assignments in a New
Zealand tertiary institution. Intercultural Education, 19(3), 203-216.
Mulligan, C., & Garofalo, R. (2011). A collaborative writing approach: Methodology and student
assessment. The Language Teacher, 35(3), 5-10.
Scotland, J. (2016). How the experience of assessed collaborative writing impacts on undergraduate
students’ perceptions of assessed group work. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(1),
15-34.
Shehadeh, A. (2011). Effects and student perceptions of collaborative writing in L2. Journal of Second
Language Writing, 20(4), 286-305.
Shin, M. (2015). Collaborative learning. English Teaching Professional, 97, 11-13.
Storch, N. (2005). Collaborative writing: Product, process, and students’ reflections. Journal of second
language writing, 14(3), 153-173.
Wigglesworth, G., & Storch, N. (2009). Pair versus individual writing: Effects on fluency, complexity and
accuracy. Language Testing.