US Centcom exaggerated progress against Daesh: officials

Published November 24th, 2015 - 12:30 GMT
Al Bawaba
Al Bawaba

Analysts' reports detailing progress made in the United States' fight against the Islamic State (Daesh) in Iraq may have been manipulated to indicate a greater degree of efficiency, U.S. defense officials reportedly said.

The officials, speaking on condition of anonymity due to the information being classified, told NBC News Monday that personnel at U.S. Central Command may have manipulated reports regarding militants in Iraq -- a focal point of the American fight against terror.

The allegations, first reported by The New York Times Sunday, say the reports may have been fixed to downplay the threat of the group in Iraq.

The report said military or civilian officials at CENTCOM, based in Florida, may have cooked the intelligence to make it appear the United States military has been making a greater impact on the fight than it really has.

President Barack Obama has since ordered an official inquiry into the matter.

"Any time there is an allegation that intelligence is being shaved in a certain way, or distorted in a certain way, that's a cause for serious concern," House Armed Services Committee chairman Mac Thornberry, R-Texas, told the Times.

One of the unnamed officials told NBC News he expected a Pentagon investigation that could lead to a shakeup of personnel at CENTCOM. However, none of the officials said they had seen any evidence to suggest intelligence reports are being doctored.

The officials noted, though, that CENTCOM is one of several agencies that pass on intelligence reports to the White House -- and that the agency would not be able to submit intelligence to the Obama administration without it first being handled by the Central Intelligence Agency.

Fox News cited a source close to CENTCOM analysts Monday in reporting that some analysts at the agency even received emails from superiors instructing them to "cut it out" and "toe the line" when it came to their intelligence reports.

The source reportedly said those emails were in response to negative assessments given by the analysts regarding the military's lack of progress in fighting the Islamic State in Iraq.

By Doug G. Ware

Editor's note: This article has been edited from the source material

You may also like

Subscribe

Sign up to our newsletter for exclusive updates and enhanced content