Saturday, Apr 20, 2024
Advertisement
Premium

AFT quashes inquiry against Major General

This is the second time that the AFT has set aside a Court of Inquiry in the matter, as an earlier inquiry too was quashed due to procedural irregularities.

Armed Forces Tribunal, aft, aft inquiry, aft inquiry major general, major general aft inquiry. punjab news, india news, indian express The AFT bench cited “bias, malafide and arbitrariness” while setting aside the inquiry and the ban against Major General R S Rathore of Army Ordnance Corps in a 2009 case.

The principal bench of the Armed Forces Tribunal (AFT) has quashed Court of Inquiry being held against a Major General over financial irregularities in an ordnance depot. The AFT also also removed the discipline and vigilance ban imposed upon him.

The AFT bench cited “bias, malafide and arbitrariness” while setting aside the inquiry and the ban against Major General R S Rathore of Army Ordnance Corps in a 2009 case. At the time the irregularities were discovered, Major Gen eral Rathore was the Commandant of Central Ordnance Depot (COD), Dehu Road, Pune, in the rank of Brigadier.

This is the second time that the AFT has set aside a Court of Inquiry in the matter, as an earlier inquiry too was quashed due to procedural irregularities.

Advertisement

The first court of inquiry was quashed in 2012 with the Army being given liberty to convene a fresh court of inquiry.

[related-post]

A new inquiry was ordered the same year but in the meantime Rathore got promoted and was posted as Major General (Ordnance), Western Command, Chandimandir.

Festive offer

In a test audit carried out during October and November 2009, certain shortcomings were noticed in the dispatch of stores through Civil Hired Transport (CHT) from April 2006 to October 2008 by COD, Dehu Road. The case involves fraudulent payments made to a transport company allegedly due to incorrect assessment of requirements of civil hired transport with the involvement of COD authorities.

As many as 99 cases were identified where , instead of clubbing the requirements, the COD dispatched the consignments to the same consignee in a piecemeal manner at the interval of two to three days by hiring more than one vehicle, resulting in an additional expenditure of Rs 35,75,000. As many 130 instances were identified wherein the COD had requisitioned CHT of higher load capacity than required for dispatching the consignments and this had resulted into an additional expenditure of Rs 22,58,000.

Advertisement

The AFT found that while ordering a fresh inquiry against the petitioner, the authorities had exhibited malafide intention to victimise him as he had succeeded in getting the first inquiry quashed. It also found that while the General Officer Commanding Maharashtra, Goa and Gujarat Area had ordered administrative action to be taken against the petitioner, it was incorrectly changed to disciplinary action when he went on a temporary foreign assignment after handing over charge to his deputy.

First uploaded on: 18-08-2015 at 09:28 IST
Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
close