More voices against Memon hanging

August 03, 2015 02:29 am | Updated November 16, 2021 05:21 pm IST

The execution of Yakub Memon for the 1993 Mumbai blasts has once again triggereda debate on death penalty. Here, activists protest in Delhi. Photo: Sushil Kumar Verma

The execution of Yakub Memon for the 1993 Mumbai blasts has once again triggereda debate on death penalty. Here, activists protest in Delhi. Photo: Sushil Kumar Verma

Raising questions over the fact that in the last few years mostly Muslims were given death penalty in terror cases, the latest being Yakub Memon, former Speaker of the West Bengal Assembly Hashim Abdul Halim said on Sunday that justice should not be “angulated.”

“Many other similar crimes [terror attacks] such as the killing of Sikhs [1984 anti-Sikh riots], the communal riots in Gujarat took place. Have the perpetrators of these crimes been punished?”

Referring to the execution of the 1993 Mumbai blast convict Memon, the former Speaker told The Hindu : “You cannot single out one particular person. There has to be proper justice not angulated justice.” Mr. Halim, who served as Speaker for nearly 30 years, is a constitutional expert.

Row over TripuraGovernor’s tweet As for Tripura Governor Tathagata Roy’s controversial tweet over the large gathering in Yakub’s funeral, Mr. Halim dubbed his comment “irrelevant” as the concerned person had already been executed. “It does not matter who attended his funeral or not,” he said on the sidelines of a seminar on ‘Democracy and its relevance to the minorities.’

The Tripura Governor courted controversy earlier this week when he tweeted that apart from Yakub’s close friends and relatives, the intelligence agencies should keep an eye on those who attended his funeral.

Unexpected remark, says ex-CJI Altamas Kabir Former Chief Justice of India, Altamas Kabir, also disapproved of Mr. Roy’s statement. “What he [Tathagata Roy] said was similar to stepping into the domain of national policy which as a Governor he ought not to have done,” Justice Kabir said on the sidelines of the seminar.

Terming Mr. Roy’s comment “unnecessary,” Justice Kabir said there was no need for Mr. Roy to make such a statement considering the constitutional post he held. “A Governor is a constitutional authority who is above all prejudice. This kind of a comment from Mr. Roy was unexpected,” Justice Kabir told The Hindu .

As for mostly minorities being given the death penalty in terror cases, Justice Kabir termed it “coincidental.” He said terror convicts were involved in cases where actions were initiated against the state.

Referring to the hanging of Yakub, Justice Kabir said it was “not proper” for him to comment on the court’s verdict.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.