When thaali issue kept scholars divided

Ma.Po. Si, Rajamanickam debated if it was prevalent in Silappathikaram period

March 14, 2015 12:00 am | Updated 05:44 am IST - CHENNAI:

The covers of books written on the subject

The covers of books written on the subject

Tamil Nadu witnessed a spirited debate on the practice of women wearing the thaali as early as in 1954.

While the attempt to debate the subject led to a minor blast near a television channel office on Thursday, it was an explosion of articles that marked the discourse then.

Erudite articles were written by Tamil scholars Ma. Rajamanickam and Ma. Po. Sivagnanam, the latter an authority on Silappathikaram who earned the title Silambuchelvar.

Ma. Po. Si argued that the custom of wearing the thaali was prevalent as early as in the period of Silappathikaram (dated by most scholars around the 2{+n}{+d}century CE). The epic refers to Kannagi, the heroine, giving up all her ornaments except her thaali .

‘Mangala Aniyirpirithani magizhaal ,’ he quoted poet Ilango as saying to drive home the point that wearing the thaali alone made her happy after her separation from Kovalan.

Ma.Po.Si. wrote an essay on Tamil marriage, now part of the book Tamizhar Thirumanam , which seeks to repudiate Rajamanickam’s argument, advanced in a lecture in Madurai, arguing that there was no evidence to show the practice was in vogue between the Sangam period and the 10th Century CE.

Rajamanickam wrote nine articles in the Sunday magazine of Tamil daily Tamil Nadu on a request from Karumuthu Sundaram Chettiyar. It was compiled as Tamizhar Thirumanathil Thaali .

Rajamanickam disagreed with Ma.Po.Si’s interpretation that mangala ani referred to the thaali, recalling Adiyarkku Nallar’s explanation that it was just an auspicious ornament and had no other meaning. Another anonymous commentator, writing an explanatory note, said mangala ani would mean natural beauty.

“Kannagi remained a natural beauty without wearing any ornaments,” Rajamanickam said, while pointing out that there was no reference to Kovalan tying a thaali to Kannagi during their wedding, even though the epic describes the ceremony in great detail.

Ma. Po. Si. sought to turn the tables on Rajamanickam arguing that Ilango left out the thaali from the description because it was a known element of Tamil culture and not a Vedic custom that required explanation.

As the debate progressed, Tamil scholars were divided into two groups, expressing solidarity either with Rajamanickam or Ma.Po.Si.

Another great scholar, Avvai Duraisami Pillai, and poet Kannadasan fully agreed with Rajamanickam, who noted that wearing the thaali probably began in the 11th century and that it was supported by Kandapuranam, Periyapuranam, Thakkiyaka Parani, Kambaramayanam, Nambi Thiruvilayadal and Paranjothi Thiruvilaiyadal .

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.