SC refuses to relax Dec 31st deadline for penalty payment

In a setback to Naveen Jindal-led Jindal Power (JPL), the Supreme Court on Thursday refused to allow the firm…

In a major setback to the Naveen Jindal-led Jindal Power Ltd (JPL), the Supreme Court on Thursday rejected its plea to allow it to pay additional levy of around Rs 1,800 crore, imposed for illegal mining by the court, in 36 equal monthly instalments.

JPL and parent Jindal Steel & Power (JSPL) need to pay Rs 1,793 crore towards Rs 295 a tonne penalty for illegal mining as directed by the Supreme Court in September order that scrapped allocation of over 200 coal blocks.
JPL operates two coal blocks, Gare Palma IV/2 and IV/3, and JSPL has one block, Gare Palma IV/1, in Chhattisgarh. While JPL has to pay Rs 1,024.54 crore as additional levy with respect to its blocks Gare Palma IV/2 and IV/3 and JSPL has to pay Rs 768.83 crore with respect to coal block Gare Palma IV/1.

A bench headed by Justice Madan B Lokur refused relief after Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi opposed allowing JPL to participate in the auction as of now, saying “December 30 is the last date and if allowed to participate now the entire auction will go for a six… they (JPL) knew the position for three months after passing of the order”.

wheat, wheat stocks, wheat procurement,
Govt introduces high yielding & disease resistance wheat variety
manufacturing, manufacturing PMI, S&P Global, new orders, output, input cost inflation
Contraction in manufacturing capex key reason for low capital formation in FY23
savings
Household savings plunge to 5-year low in FY23
India received over $111 billion in remittances in 2022, first country to ever reach that figure: United Nations

Senior counsel Abhishek Singhvi and Kapil Sibal argued the company is being “doubly punished” for the government’s fault. One, by cancellation of blocks and second due to the additional levy. Stating it was unable to cough up the penalty by December 31, the court-mandated deadline, JPL said: “Payment of additional levy is humongous and back-breaking, which is forcing the applicant to financial ruin. The imposition of such a levy was unexpected and the applicant has not made provision in the books of account… if this court does not extend the time to pay the levy, grave prejudice would be caused in not only carrying out its expansion plans, payment of debts but also in carrying out operations.”

Get live Share Market updates, Stock Market Quotes, and the latest India News and business news on Financial Express. Download the Financial Express App for the latest finance news.

First published on: 19-12-2014 at 01:45 IST
Market Data
Market Data