Facebook sues big law firm over fake ‘owner’ claims

Social Networking Sites May Be Monitored By Security Services
LONDON, ENGLAND - MARCH 25: In this photo illustration the Social networking site Facebook is displayed on a laptop screen on March 25, 2009 in London, England. The British government has made proposals which would force Social networking websites such as Facebook to pass on details of users, friends and contacts to help fight terrorism. (Photo by Dan Kitwood/Getty Images)
Photograph by Dan Kitwood—Getty Images

Back in 2011, attorney Robert Brownlie told me: “Anyone who claims this case is fraudulent and brought by a scam artist will come to regret those claims.” Brownlie, a partner at DLA Piper, one of the world’s largest law firms, was referring to a 2010 lawsuit brought by a shady character named Paul Ceglia who claimed to own a large chunk of Facebook.

Ceglia’s claims have long been dismissed amid substantial evidence that he fabricated many of his supporting documents, and now it’s likely Brownlie who regrets his claims. On Monday, Facebook (FB) filed suit against Brownlie, DLA Piper and several other lawyers and firms that got involved in the case for their representation of Ceglia, who claimed to be entitled to 50% ownership in the social network, based on work he had done with Mark Zuckerberg seven years earlier.

“We said from the beginning that Paul Ceglia’s claim was a fraud and that we would seek to hold those responsible accountable,” says Colin Stretch, Facebook’s general counsel. “DLA Piper and the other named law firms knew the case was based on forged documents yet they pursued it anyway, and they should be held to account.”

The complaint was filed in New York Supreme Court, and accuses the firms of malicious prosecution and collusion with the intent to deceive a court. Facebook is requesting both treble damages and punitive damages.

Brownlie’s statement to me, made while I was reporting the story for the New York Times, are cited in Facebook’s complaint.

In response to today’s suit, a DLA spokesman said the following:

This is an entirely baseless lawsuit that has been filed as a tactic to intimidate lawyers from bringing litigation against Facebook. DLA Piper, which was not part of this case at its outset or its conclusion, was involved for 78 days. Facebook and Mr. Zuckerberg claim that they were damaged in those 78 days, yet a mere 10 months after DLA Piper withdrew from the case and while the litigation was still pending, Facebook went to market with an initial public offering that valued the company at $100 billion. Today, Facebook is worth $200 billion and Mr. Zuckerberg is among the richest people in the world. We will defend this meritless litigation aggressively and we will prevail.

Facebook’s suit should not, however, be too surprising to DLA Piper. Back in 2012, Fortune’s Roger Parloff wrote that this day was coming. View Facebook’s complaint below:

[scribd id=243713009 key=key-8MDdu1juZV3stVc1aqMe mode=scroll]

Subscribe to Data Sheet, our daily newsletter about the business of tech. Sign up for free.