In conversation with Ranjith, director of ‘Madras’

The full transcript of Pa. Ranjith’s interview on Madras

October 16, 2014 11:15 pm | Updated November 16, 2021 07:02 pm IST - Chennai

'Madras' is a film about Dalits and their way of life, says director Ranjith.

'Madras' is a film about Dalits and their way of life, says director Ranjith.

Why do you think 'Madras' has been elevated to a special place in Tamil cinema by commentators and critics?

'Madras' is a film about Dalits and their way of life. In Tamil cinema, the perception about culture and the lifestyle of Dalits has been distorted to a great extent. The people of North Madras have been shown as violent people with no great ideas. However, North Madras is a place where the youth love hip-hop and where Michael Jackson, football and Bob Marley are popular. The popular culture of Black people has caught up in North Madras. Majority of the youth are educated, hard working and upwardly mobile. The audience, I think, like this film because it celebrates the vibrant cultural life of those living in North Madras.

Can you elaborate on the distortions of people of North Madras in Tamil cinema?

For example, when I appeared in some television discussions, I was told that the ‘Tamil’ spoken in the film is not the Tamil spoken in North Madras. I was surprised. What kind of Tamil that people think they speak in North Madras? What is considered the ‘Madras’ slang has evolved with time like everything else but the perception one gets from Tamil cinema is different.

The language people speak; the rise in literacy levels, their interest in sports and the general cultural changes that have taken place over the years have not been reflected in our movies. Even the Gaana songs, which are so popular in Tamil cinema, are being used only as ‘item songs’ in movies. But, people sing Gaana songs for all kinds of occasions. In my first two films, I have tried to use Gaana as a love song.

Can you explain the film for starters?

In my view, it is about competing ideas of two people: Anbu who thinks that political power is enough to change the systemic issues, and Kali who rejects party politics and feels that education empowers people. He believes in getting to the root of the problem. Kali is a progressive, rational person, which is why he can’t pursue the politics of Anbu. It leans towards a Periyarite-Ambedkarite politics.

Why do you think mainstream journalists missed the political references in Madras?

I don’t know honestly. This film very openly talks about politics and politics concerning the Dalits. It is a mainstream film. For instance, Kali (the protagonist) reads ‘Theendadha Vasantham’, a very notable book in the history of Dalit literature. Dr. Ambedkar’s books are placed prominently in the book shelf of the hero and other characters. The female protagonist’s father belongs to the Republican Party of India. The colour blue – associated with Ambedkarite politics – is featured prominently in the film. I don’t know how a film critic can say that ‘I don’t understand Ambedkarite politics or know about the life of people living in North Chennai’. There was nothing hidden for the critic to interpret it. It was for everyone to see.

On the criticism that it turned into a revenge saga:

The wall is just a signifier of the conflict. It doesn’t say that the end of power struggle around the wall signifies the end of the social conflict itself. I have tried to say that oppression exists and people like Kali are beginning to find rational ways to end the oppression.

On the criticism that the film celebrates a specific caste:

I disagree with films that reinforce the greatness of certain castes. This is not that kind of a film. In fact, this is a film that calls for annihilation of caste and an end to discrimination.

On responsibility of a filmmaker when tackling issues of caste in movies:

Caste is a social reality in India. As far as I am concerned, the films about caste should expose the status quo and shine light on the system that reinforces and reproduces caste hierarchies. I admire Iranian filmmakers for the way in which they criticise the dominant conservative ideology of their society even with strict state censorship. In India, we don’t grapple with such censorship. Indian filmmakers have to protect this freedom and make responsible films that do not rob us of our right to make such films. In Tamil cinema, I think Vazhakku En was a powerful film, which spoke truth to the power. When we place the systemic issues before the people, it is my belief that they will start thinking about how to solve it.

Why do films about issues related to caste discrimination are far and few in Tamil Cinema?

There is a market for films that celebrates caste supremacy and is in praise of certain communities. But, producers don’t back a film about life and culture of Dalits because there is no market. Despite the fact that highly successful actors and filmmakers coming from the community, films featuring Dalit characters and cultures aren’t being made simply because the market for such films hasn’t been created. We need to create that market. I was told that Madras wouldn’t do well in Southern regions of Tamil Nadu because of its content. It has defied these predictions.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.