Erecting more barriers for the qualified

Instead of creating public awareness, increasing support for women doctors, PMDC has decided to embrace discrimination


Muhammad Hamid Zaman October 13, 2014

Let us start with some facts. First, Pakistan has a dismal record on maternal health, with deaths around delivery amongst the highest in the world. Chronic diseases among women are also very high, despite often being underreported due to a male-dominated societal structure. Second, in Pakistan, women are far more likely to go to a female doctor for their health challenges than a male doctor. Third, when it comes to pre-medical students and admissions standards set by medical schools, girls outperform boys by at least two-to-one, i.e., based on merit, our medical schools get 66 per cent or more female students or about 33 per cent or less male students. Fourth, societal expectations, high barriers for women to join the workforce, systemic biases and dangerous conditions for personal security in many rural areas make it impossible for women to serve in remote parts of the country.

Now, let us look at another fact. Fully aware of these ground realities, the national custodian of medical education and training, the Pakistan Medical and Dental Council (PMDC), recently required that all public medical colleges must have a 50 per cent quota for men. In other words, admit fewer females, despite them outperforming boys, and admit more boys despite them not doing as well as the girls in the entrance exams. The arguments given by the PMDC showed the classic biased mentality that is enshrined in our male-dominated, female suppressing, unfair system. The official statement wore a thin cloak of gender equality to hide the ugly beast of discrimination, while at the same time indicating that national resources are being wasted on females. Some went as far as to say that girls use their medical college admission to get better suitors for marriage. When these views are expressed by those who have not had any education or training, one would call them most unfortunate and inappropriate. When they come from doctors and professionals in medical education, they are outright disgusting and show a rotten core. They point to the misogyny that has enveloped society.

It is indeed true that many female graduates are unable to perform in far-flung areas, but saying that it is because of lack of interest or motivation is simply not true. We have systemic barriers, including lack of security for female doctors, combined with societal expectations about the role of a woman, that play a central role in stopping our talented women to serve. Instead of creating public awareness, increasing support for women doctors who want to work, and lobbying the government to improve security and create better policies, the PMDC, which historically has been male-dominated, has decided to not only embrace discrimination, it has also put the blame for our poor rural health squarely on female doctors.

The PMDC needs to look at the extraordinary contributions of female medical professionals in the country in addressing most difficult challenges. In my own work in global public health, I have met far more women than men from Pakistan, who are making a profound contribution in decreasing maternal mortality, improving child health and helping in strengthening the system at all levels. At every conference that I have attended on improving health outcomes in Pakistan’s rural areas, there are more women professionals than men. The contribution of female physicians and medical researchers is of the highest quality and shows the determination and passion that is needed to change our current course. The results from the work by Pakistani female public health professionals are used as models and textbook examples around the world. These women are making a tangible positive change, through sheer will and determination, despite societal pressures, unjust barriers and the bias embraced by the likes of the PMDC. It would be better off recognising the contribution of brave women doctors and public health professionals of the country, and in doing so, would hopefully encourage other men and women to improve our national health, both literally and figuratively.

Published in The Express Tribune, October 14th, 2014.

Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.

COMMENTS (12)

a PTI walee | 9 years ago | Reply

Khan : it matters an awful lot. We need to have female voice in key decision making. They are more sensitive to challenges faced by women. Would you not agree?

AA | 9 years ago | Reply

Ideally, we should have 50/50 ratio of males/females in medical colleges and in professional practice also. However, we cannot do that by making rules based on gender discrimination. In 1980s, supreme court declared allocation of 50/50 seats for males/females unconstitutional and I'm sure will do so again if approached. We have about 2:1 ratio in favor of females in colleges but worse than the reverse in professional practice and that is the issue. Yes, because of societal pressures most female graduates don't practice, but some males also leave to foreign countries. One solution could be a 5 year mandatory practice after graduation or full payment of medical school tuition. But this can only be enforced if opportunities and safe working environment are provided. Also, we should attract more boys to pre-medical and girls to other fields as pre-medical enrollment is lopsided too and that is where the problem starts.

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ