Man of the moment is fifth judge in the case

Five judges in 11 years

September 27, 2014 02:19 am | Updated November 28, 2021 07:38 am IST - Bangalore:

The disproportionate assets case against Tamil Nadu Chief Minister Jayalalithaa that took nearly 11 years at the Special Court in Bangalore to reach the stage of final verdict, has witnessed four full-time judges before it landed in the hands of the present judge, John Michael Cunha, who is set to deliver the verdict on Saturday.

A.S. Pachhapure, the first judge of the Special Court, assumed the post in December 2003 after the case was transferred to Bangalore by the Supreme Court in November that year. However, he could not conduct proceedings from August 2005 as the Supreme Court had stayed the order passed by him by clubbing the two cases into one case of disproportionate assets. The post fell vacant in July 2007 when Mr. Pachhapure was elevated as a judge of the Karnataka High Court.

Later A.T. Munoli took charge as the judge but no effective proceeding was held during his tenure due to Supreme Court’s stay order. After his retirement, B.M. Mallikarjunaiah was appointed to the post.

The trial had made substantial progress as crucial proceedings like re-examination of some of the witnesses by the prosecution, recording the statements of Ms. Jayalalithaa in person, etc were conducted during the tenure of Mr. Mallikarjunaiah, who retired in August 2012.

M.S. Balakrishna took over the position in November 2013 and he completed the process of recording statements of three other accused and had almost completed final arguments when the controversy arose about the certain procedure adopted by him and the new Special Public Prosecutor G. Bhavani Singh. Though Supreme Court upheld the procedure and permitted to continue the service of Mr. Balakrishna beyond his retirement for completing the trial, he refused to continue after his retirement on September 30, 2013.

Following this, Mr. Cunha was appointed to the post in October 2013 and he heard the final arguments afresh. He had passed strictures against the accused and their counsel for “protracting the trial and suppressing the facts from the Court.”

Mr. Cunha, hailing from Mangalore, had started practise as a lawyer in 1985 and was selected to the post of district judge in 2002. He served in Dharward, Bellary and Bangalore in various positions, including as Secretary to the Chief Justices and as Registrar (Vigilance) of the High Court prior to his present posting.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.