Tamil Nadu’s solar mission grounded

No legal sanctity to Tangedco’s transparent bidding process for power purchase from 52 companies, says TNERC

September 18, 2014 08:26 am | Updated November 16, 2021 07:12 pm IST - CHENNAI:

Solar panels being fixed atop a residential building in Madurai. File photo: R Ashok

Solar panels being fixed atop a residential building in Madurai. File photo: R Ashok

The State’s solar mission has come to a nought.

The Tamil Nadu Electricity Regulatory Commission (TNERC) has passed an order stating that there is no legal sanctity to the Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation’s (Tangedco) transparent bidding process for solar power purchase from 52 companies.

“The bidding process has no legal sanctity for consideration under Section 63 of the Electricity Act, 2003,” said TNERC members S. Nagalsamy and G. Rajagopal in an order on Monday, a copy of which is available with The Hindu .

“The petitions suffer from the prerequisite of transparent bidding process in accordance with the guidelines issued be the Central government,” the order said dismissing the Tangedco’s petitions to approve its proposal to purchase 708 MW of solar power from 52 generators within the State for 20 years.

Reproducing Section 63 (Determination of Tariff by bidding process) of the Electricity Act, 2003 in its order, the commission said the words “in accordance with the guidelines issued by the Central government” in the section were significant.

The TNERC said the petitioner had averred that there were no Central guidelines and the Ministry of Renewable Energy had issued draft guidelines only on December 27, 2012 – that is after the tender invited by the Tangedco.

As specified in the Section 63, the Centre’s guidelines were a prerequisite for the transparent process of bidding. Therefore, the Tangedco’s bidding had no legal sanctity for consideration under Section 63 of the Electricity Act, 2003, the TNERC ruled.

When the Tangedco contended that they followed Tamil Nadu Transparency in Tenders Act 1998 for conducting the bidding, the TNERC said it was an accepted principle that “If a statute directs a thing to be done in certain way that thing shall not be done in any other way.”

“It is legally invalid to follow any other terms / procedure for the bidding process,” the TNERC said categorically.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.