Internal probe in CBI on non-arrest of Bhushan Steel vice-chairman

Despite the CBI Director's orders to arrest him, the team only served on him a notice following which he absconded.

August 05, 2014 08:34 pm | Updated April 21, 2016 02:38 am IST - New Delhi

Central Bureau of Investigation Director Ranjit Sinha has ordered an internal inquiry to ascertain why the team that conducted searches at the residence of Bhushan Steel vice-chairman Neeraj Singhal, in connection with a graft case against suspended Syndicate Bank CMD S.K. Jain, did not arrest him.

“We have ordered an internal inquiry into the non-arrest of Neeraj Singhal by our team,” said Mr. Sinha on Tuesday.

During the searches carried out last week in Delhi, apart from Mumbai, Bhopal and Bangalore, the CBI team reached Mr. Singhal’s premises when he was there. Although there were orders straight from the CBI Director to arrest him, the team instead served on him a notice under Section 160 of the Criminal Procedure Code to join investigations the next day.

However, the Bhushan Steel vice-chairman later vanished from the scene and remains “untraced”. He has moved an anticipatory bail application that is coming up for hearing on Wednesday.

It is alleged that Mr. Jain had allegedly taken a bribe of Rs.50 lakh from Bhushan Steel to ensure that a nearly Rs.100-crore loan to the company was not declared Non-Performing Assets. Although the CBI has alleged that Prakash Industries had also paid bribe to the accused for the same purpose, it is yet to trace the amount. “The bribe money was being paid through the hawala channel,” said an official.

On Monday, the agency arrested another accused Mukesh Jindal and seized Rs.26.90 lakh in cash from his residence. He was produced before Special CBI judge Swarana Kanta Sharma. The agency informed the court that the accused is a cousin and employee of one of the already arrested accused. The court granted the agency his one-day police custody.

The court sent two other accused, Prakash Industries CMD Ved Prakash Agarwal and his junior colleague Vipul Agarwal, to judicial custody denying the agency’s request for extension of their police custody.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.