BETA
This is a BETA experience. You may opt-out by clicking here

More From Forbes

Edit Story

Good News in Asia: Only So Much Subsidy at Pump

This article is more than 9 years old.

One of the reforms pressed by global finance on newly elected Indonesian president Joko Widodo is a cut in the fuel subsidies (gasoline and diesel) by which the country directs precious public funds into more use of personal vehicles on inadequate roads. With some of the worst traffic congestion in Asia, Jakarta--where Jokowi, as the president-elect is known, has been governor--is an abject lesson in why not to misallocate such resources.

These subsidies, because they most seem to benefit the struggling working or "middle" classes, are awfully hard to cut politically, and Jokowi is already going to have problems building a governing coalition. The good news, I suppose, is that bad as this strike against Indonesia is--its remaining fuel subsidies per-capita are the second highest in Asia--the region as a whole is a lesser offender than other parts of the world.

As economist Lucas Davis of U.C. Berkeley's Haas school shows in the current issue of the Milken Institute Review, fuel subsidies tend to be one more bit of the "oil curse" that afflicts countries where such seeming black gold has been drawn from the earth.  The bargain in such places can be this: We (the state or its oil-major partner) drill the nation's patrimony and in return we give you, the people, a nearly free pass to drive wherever roads will take you. Not only is this bad for traffic, but it doesn't do the air any good either. (Climate change is another potential result.)

So, of the top 10 per-capita recipients of fuel breaks, as shown by Prof. Davis, nine are from the North Africa-Middle East belt.  And the subsidies there can be way high: $948 a year for every Qatari, in the No. 1 spot.  (That doesn't include all the imported laborers, who outnumber the citizens.)  Compare that to the totals in No. 14 Malaysia ($84) and No. 15 Indonesia ($75)--not that big of a problem, it might seem.  It's more of an issue when you consider income levels in the countries, however--Indonesia is spending a lot more proportionally on this than the Middle Easterners.

I am grateful to Prof. Davis for providing me with figures beyond those published by Milken, which only extend to the top 10.  In the remainder of the top 25, you find no other South or East Asian country--just a few from Central Asia.  Thailand, of the infamous rice and rubber protections for farmers, shows up at No. 28. India has diesel subsidies, and that will be an issue for its new prime minister Narendra Modi, but they pale by per-capita comparison--at No. 29 for fuel overall. (Food subsidies are a bigger rub.)  Likewise, China by curbing some of its more noxious pump handouts has escaped per-capita attention.

+-----------------------------------------------+

|      country   TotSubPC   GasSubPC   DieSubPC |

|-----------------------------------------------|

1. |        Qatar   947.5099   361.4908    586.019 |

2. | Saudi Arabia   885.4348   454.1056   431.3293 |

3. |       Kuwait   859.7854   569.3481   290.4373 |

4. |      Bahrain   769.9468   437.5385   332.4082 |

5. |        Libya   454.3874   143.0297   311.3576 |

|-----------------------------------------------|

6. |    Venezuela   445.3718   358.4581    86.9137 |

7. |       Brunei   424.2012    222.562   201.6392 |

8. |         Oman   377.7849   350.5217   27.26321 |

9. |         Iran   279.9982   116.6685   163.3297 |

10. |       U.A.E.   269.5445   174.8664   94.67814 |

|-----------------------------------------------|

11. |      Algeria   165.0667   38.63519   126.4315 |

12. |      Ecuador   121.9484   30.75047   91.19792 |

13. |        Egypt    101.877   37.75636   64.12062 |

14. |     Malaysia   83.54851   47.45036   36.09814 |

15. |    Indonesia   75.34238   44.91179   30.43059 |

|-----------------------------------------------|

16. |      Bolivia   74.25906   21.82284   52.43621 |

17. |        Syria   46.59778          0   46.59778 |

18. |      Tunisia   44.67528    .773868   43.90141 |

19. |         Iraq    34.1233          0    34.1233 |

20. |       Angola   29.38511   8.555042   20.83007 |

|-----------------------------------------------|

21. |   Kyrgyzstan   26.13405   3.348178   22.78588 |

22. |      Belarus   21.46595   3.724338   17.74162 |

23. |        Yemen   17.35928   13.55972   3.799553 |

24. |   Azerbaijan   14.00029          0   14.00029 |

25. |   Kazakhstan   5.587463          0   5.587463 |

|-----------------------------------------------|

26. |      Nigeria   5.447035   5.447035          0 |

27. |    Sri Lanka   4.915472          0   4.915472 |

28. |     Thailand    4.39225          0    4.39225 |

29. |        India   3.971134          0   3.971134 |

30. |      Morocco   3.305837          0   3.305837 |

+-----------------------------------------------+

Although heavy use of fuel chits is associated with countries that have had petroleum development (both Malaysia and Indonesia have such histories), they do not accrue only to the blessed.  Some wretchedly poor nations are high on the per-capita subsidy charts:  Belarus, Yemen, Algeria and (nowadays) Egypt.  The largesse can be a way for autocrats to keep power while they siphon off most of the riches for themselves and cronies.  By far the most egregious case of high subsidies amid desperate circumstances is Venezuela, which ranks No. 4 per-capita and, in a separate chart published by Milken and Davis, can be seen as offering gasoline by the gallon at the cost of a few bananas and getting more consumption per-capita than Japan as a result.  (Venezuela also uses its oil to support other wretched governments in Latin America, which in turn buy public tolerance with cheaper fuel.)

The fact that Asia has only the extent of a fuel-subsidy problem that it manifests today is both a blessing and a warning:  As drilling proceeds in many of the region's coastal waters, there is a danger not just of conflict over those resources, but of any captured oil being turned into the waste that we see elsewhere.  Better examples such as Norway show that good fortune can translate into higher rates of college graduation as money is spent on human capital and the roads are kept basic and clear.